[News Service Index] [Comment Blog] [Now on Facebook] [Heartlink Home] [Bio] [Heartlink Radio Show] [Coaching/Counseling] [Classes] [Seminars] [Other Services] [Contact] [Disclaimer]


Microchip Implants 

RFID in the hospital: Not so private eyes are watching you - Scientific American Inc

You’ve been tagged.

Hospitals are increasingly using electronic-monitoring equipment to track patients, employees and medical devices to prevent them from going the way of the Junior Mint Seinfeld’s Kramer infamously dropped into an open surgical patient.

The e-tracking software has been used for more than a decade by hospitals to prevent baby kidnappings, the Wall Street Journal reports today. But now hospitals are tagging patients with radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices to, among other things, cut down on emergency room waiting time by keeping track of how long each person has been in the ER. They're tagging employees to get a handle on departments that need staff or can spare them. And equipment is tagged so it can be easily located – and to prevent surgeons from inadvertently leaving it inside patients.

RFID tags are small, silicon chips containing information that’s captured remotely by computers that decode the data. About 10 percent of U.S. hospitals now use the devices, and the Journal reports that most hospitals will be using them within a decade.

But critics warn that such technology could violate privacy rights.

"Initially there was a real fear among the staff that management would somehow use this [tracking] information in a nefarious way, but we worked hard to mitigate that" by, for instance, keeping sensors out of staff bathrooms and break rooms, Linda Laskowski Jones, vice president of emergency services at Christiana Care Health System in Newark, Del., told the Journal.

Other healthcare providers said the tags have helped cut down on lost equipment – and the time it takes to locate it. "In the old days, I had to send five people looking in every nook and cranny for a blood-gas analyzer," Deborah Bahlman, manager of regional surgical services for Providence Health & Services in Portland, Ore., told the newspaper, "but now I can log into any PC and see exactly where it is sitting on a map."

To find out more about how RFID systems work and how they’re being used for a variety of purposes, take a look at our interactive graphic.

RFID in the hospital: Not so private eyes are watching you


Microchip Implants - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A human microchip implant is an integrated circuit device or RFID tag encased in silicate glass and implanted into a human's body. Such subdermal implants can be used for information storage, including personal identification, medical history, medications, allergies, and contact information.

In 2002, the VeriChip Corporation received preliminary approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market its device in the U.S. within specific guidelines.[citation needed] Since its approval, about 80 hospitals and 232 doctors have elected to use the system.[2]

By implanting such a chip with a patient's medical record, hospitals and emergency workers can immediately gain access to an ill or injured person's medical history regardless of location or condition. Implanted chips are impossible to lose, which could reduce or increase the chances of information theft. Homes and automobiles could be equipped with scanners for microchips, making house and car keys obsolete (although an RFID lock requires a working power source to function). Locks and ignition switches would only work for persons with an appropriately programmed chip.

[edit] Possible problems

If the microchips are completely unencrypted, they would be extremely vulnerable to hacker attacks and interception by third-party scanners. By scanning secretly, someone could steal all of the information on a chip and could clone the signal, possibly leading to criminal misuse of medical files and insurance information. For example, a patient's list of known allergies could be altered maliciously, causing injury or death, or his/her insurance could be copied for another unrelated person to use.[2]

According to the FDA, implantation of the chip itself poses some health concerns. A patient could react adversely to the chip itself by infection or allergy, or it could be implanted improperly. It could dislodge itself and move to a different part of the body than where it was first implanted. The implant could also fail on its own at any time, and the information contained in it could be lost.

More serious trauma could occur if the chip reacts to outside source, such as a strong electrical field or a magnetic resonance imager (MRI) machine. The strong magnets used in an MRI scanner could destroy the implant and cause serious burns, internally and externally.[3]

However, Mythbusters has shown that the dangers of such an event occurring are extremely rare, with the test subject showing no signs of pain or trauma. Of course, the model and make of the chip could affect possible outcomes as well.

Veterinary and toxicology studies carried out from 1996 to 2006 found that lab mice and rats injected with microchips sometimes developed subcutaneous sarcomas. Data suggest that up to 10% of the implanted lab animals developed malignant cancers originating in the tissue surrounding the microchips. Dr. Cheryl London, a veterinarian oncologist at Ohio State University, noted: "It's much easier to cause cancer in mice than it is in people. So it may be that what you're seeing in mice represents an exaggerated phenomenon of what may occur in people." London suggested a 20-year study of chipped canines was needed "to see if you have a biological effect." Specialists from several pre-eminent cancer institutions have supported such testing before microchips are implanted on a large scale in humans.[citation needed]

[edit] Future applications

Contrary to popular belief[citation needed], a GPS-enabled chip, for GPS tracking of individuals, does not yet exist — mainly due to problems with power consumption and antenna performance. Another hurdle facing this type of GPS application is the fact that once the implant receives the GPS data from GPS satellites, how does it report its location to the outside world? Transmitting this data would require a very large power source and a system like the currently existing mobile phone network to make the application practical and reliable. Since the device would be implanted, battery life would also be a major concern since charging and/or battery replacement would be difficult at best. This type of implanted GPS technology has a long long way to go before it, if ever, becomes reality. However, these facts have not stopped various media and news sources, blogs, and websites from claiming that implantable RFID chips can track the implanted individual as if they were wearing or carrying a portable tracking device.

Theoretically, a GPS-enabled chip could make it possible for individuals to be physically located by latitude, longitude, altitude, speed, and direction of movement. This could aid authorities in locating missing persons and/or fugitives and those who fled from a crime scene. VeriChip is one of the companies working on a GPS-capable chip.[4] Another potential application, discussed (2008) by the government of Indonesia's Irian Jaya is to monitor activities of persons infected with HIV, aiming at the reducing the chances of them infecting other people.[5]

A medical devices company, Calypso Medical,[6] has developed a technology that it calls "GPS for the body" (but that is unrelated to "real" GPS, and that does not make use of signals from the GPS satellites), which is implanted into prostate cancer patients to help monitor the position of the prostate during radiation therapy.

[edit] Ethical Questions

Microchip implant in humans have raised new ethical discussions by scientific professional forums[clarify],[7] academic groups,[8] human rights organizations, government departments and religious groups. Some Christians believe that the Mark of the Beast in the Book of Revelation can be interpreted as an implant[citation needed]. It has also been published lately by several US government organizations that implanting chips in humans may assist in studying cancer.[9]

http://www.spychips.com/
http://www.antichips.com/
http://www.nocards.org/

You can Comment at Hearlink Blog


Please go to Ascension for SOLUTIONS


What's the greatest thing you could ever do?  Imagine it and do it!


Register for Hypnosis Secrets Revealed Seminar or  The Crossing Classes. If you can't join us physically join our ONLINE CLASSES - including SACRED GEOMETRY.

[HeartlinkShop & Crop Circle Cards ] Check out my Classes  

  © 2010 Hearlink Blog. All Rights reserved.
Contact Us:       blog@cabiz.net      http://heartlink.wordpress.com