
"The biggest robbery in the
history of this country is taking place as you read this. Though no guns are
being used, 300 million hostages are being taken. Make no mistake about
it: After stealing a half trillion dollars to line the pockets of their
war-profiteering backers for the past five years, after lining the pockets of
their fellow oilmen to the tune of over a hundred billion dollars in just the
last two years, Bush and his cronies -- who must soon vacate the White House --
are looting the U.S. Treasury of every dollar they can grab. They are swiping as
much of the silverware as they can on their way out the door.”~ Michael
Moore, American Filmmaker, at
www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=235
THE FAKE $700 BILLION BAILOUT RESCUE PLAN
By: Devvy
October 2, 2008
Few things shock me
anymore, I'm sad to say. However, Monday, September 29, 2008, was something
to behold. Not only didn't the insidious "bail out" pass in the U.S. House
of Representatives, but a substantial number of Americans put up such a
ruckus, it had to have had a very chilling effect on the shadow government.
As I watched the DOW tank to -777, I wondered why the Bush Administration's
PPT (Plunge Protection Team) didn't step in and stop the dive. It occurred
to me why the money cartel may have decided not to intervene. The American
people would come home from work, already worried about the economy, see the
stock market had tanked big time and panic.
Immediately following the vote, all the finger pointing began with what can
only be described as behavior attributable to kindergartners. Pelosi went on
record saying the Democrats would not pass this "end of the world
legislation" unless they got "cover" from a bipartisan vote with a large
enough number of Republicans. I kid you not, that's what this flaky female
upchucked. Not to be outdone, millions by now have seen Republicans respond
to allegations that some of them voted against the bill because of Pelosi's
rancorous criticism of Bush and the GOP right before the vote.
Both
sides began a propaganda campaign, aided and abetted by fact challenged
media and cable news network hot shots like Bill O'Reilly and McCain pimp,
Sean Hannity. Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, must be cackling
from Hell. The mantra took on a form and text that has been virtually
unchanged for three days as I write this column; it has been repeated by
Obama and McCain shamelessly. As I write this, Obama is on the senate floor
spewing the same propaganda: If this rescue plan doesn't get passed, small
employers won't be able to make payroll on Friday. College students won't be
able to pay tuition. Businesses can't borrow. Americans won't be able to buy
a car or home. Commerce will stop. These key sentences have been repeated
over and over and over.
Without
question, the situation is bleak as thousands of us have written for years.
Maria Bartiromo, CNBC financial expert (whose
credibility came into question regarding her cozy relationship with
Citigroup), stated on MSNBC, September 30, 2008, and I'm paraphrasing: Banks
aren't lending and until the banks are "recapitalized," they won't loan.
Couples with perfect credit will have trouble getting a home mortgage, never
mind those with 'a problem.'
In other
words, because these massive lending institutions and banks have been caught
with cooked books and gross mismanagement, the American people must bail
them out to "recapitalize," reward incompetence and perhaps even criminal
activity. Americans who should never have qualified for home loans should be
given special treatment at the expense of those who have never been able to
buy a home (or don't want one), or who make their loan payments on time.
I called
our federal credit union today to inquire about a car loan; I'm not buying,
just doing research. They said they're loaning and happy to help me out. I
called our federal savings bank to inquire about a home mortgage; I'm not
buying, just doing research. Well, they certainly are making loans. I see
Countrywide's current ads seeking home buyers. I have no doubt that credit
has tightened up considerably, but banks and lending institutions are
supposed to be cautious with depositors and stock holders money. If they
make bad loans and bad decisions, like any other business, they fail. Yes,
we're talking about banks here, but in a free market system which works
best, government bail outs, while not only being unconstitutional, will
never solve the problem.
While
the majority of Americans are at work (or school) during the day and with
time at a premium, many are not able to see anything other than the scare
tactics we've seen this past week. While millions of Americans (Bravo!) hit
the phones, faxes and emails to Congress, many more don't see the big
picture or understand just how complicated the system has become: A behemoth
bringing down our country, drowning we the people in debt. Please remember
that while you and I and our children are "recapitalizing" these lenders and
banks, the bad debt is still there. With this vote, the government is going
to unconstitutionally buy all this used toilet paper.
Since my
last column, the national debt has now risen above $10 TRILLION dollars. The
people's purse is overdrawn in numbers most people can't comprehend, yet
Congress is jumping out of their skin to write even more hot checks to bail
out bad businesses and the list will continue to grow. Despite the new
"loans" given the big auto makers last week from an empty treasury, the
outlook is bleak: June 20, 2008.
General Motors Death Watch 181: Bankruptcy. "Meanwhile, despite their
political influence, the United Auto Workers will not be happy; the Mother
of All Health Care VEBAs will not be funded. Period. The union will have to
make do with what they have. DT figures the rest of the OPEB (Other
Post-Employment Benefits) also face a grim, under-funded future."
Why the
shrill insistence that "something" get done before Congress adjourns? Why
the massive push to "cobble" together a bill before Congress goes out of
session for a three month vacation? The DOW took a dive on Monday, but on
Tuesday closed up 485, recovering much of the loss from the day before.
While Congress was closed to celebrate the Jewish holiday, Rosh Hosana, the
market worked on its own. Back on October 3, 2006, Michael Nystrom, penned
an excellent piece titled,
The Dow's Phony
High, where he pointed out:
"But
look beyond the headlines, and you see a different story. While the Dow hit
a new high today, not a single of its component stocks did. Interesting,
isn't it? The index is at a new all time high, but 70% of its components are
down 20% or more!"
Where
did this $700 billion dollar number come from? It's been repeated ad
nauseum. When one considers these inept public servants (both parties)
turned a blind eye until the problem blew up in their faces right before
they were ready to adjourn for the year, don't they wonder how this $700
billion dollar price tag was suddenly thrown out there?
Perhaps this will solve the puzzle for them:
"Our
buddy from two lifetimes ago, Carl Lavin over at
Forbes.com, points out a fascinating paragraph buried in a story on his
web site late last week by Brian Wingfield and Josh Zumbrun.
"You
know, this $700-billion figure that exploded into everyday political
parlance almost as fast as Sarah? The $700-billion "cost" of resolving the
financial crisis and restoring confidence and liquidity in the credit
markets starting this morning?
"The
$700-billion figure that Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid first
said he could really use McCain's help with, but then the Arizonan took him
up on it and Reid suddenly said the Republican would only get in the way and
anyway, Reid said, he already had a done deal, except he didn't and the
Nevadan ended up being the embarrassed one?
"The
$700-billion figure that won't really end up being anywhere near the actual
cost because no one knows what all those mortgaged properties are really
worth now anyway? Which is the whole problem in the first place because the
institutions holding that paper don't know the value of what they're holding
either, which is why everyone suddenly got so frightened?
"That
$700-billion figure that won't really last because eventually the feds will
sell off what they're buying and might even make a profit in the end as they
did with the Chrysler bailout warrants years ago? You know where that very
important $700-billion figure came from?
"Here's
a quote from that Forbes story: "It's not based on any particular data
point," a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. "We just wanted to
choose a really large number." They made it up to be sufficiently ginormous
to frighten everyone into rapid action. And it worked."
A
Treasury spokes mouth said the $700 billion dollar figure was made up. The
number is fake! These elitists who run our lives believe in their arrogance
they could simply pluck a big enough number out of the sky and the American
people would swallow it out of fear. It sort of worked because as the old
saying goes, You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the
people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Headlines around the world the past week have screeched bank bail outs in
many other countries blaming the U.S., and demanding our Congress pass this
$700 billion dollar hoax. I don't think enough Americans understand just how
convoluted and massive are the connections between the unconstitutional,
privately owned "Federal" Reserve and other global financial institutions.
How many Americans know this private banking cartel is
being
audited by another corrupt mega outfit called the International Monetary
Fund --- unlawfully funded with billions annually from the sweat and labor
of the American people: "In fact, the United States now supplies $27 billion
of funds to the IMF at an annual cost to the taxpayer of $1.9 billion--an
expenditure conspicuous by its absence in the Federal budget and a hidden
element in our deficit and debt."[1]
Pretty
neat magic trick since there's no money in the people's treasury. Every
penny has to be borrowed from the FED and handed over to these international
banker barons while you, me, our children and grand children will be forever
saddled with the compounding debt. As if this dark comedy couldn't get any
worse, these craven individuals who serve in one Congress after another,
continue to "forgive" debt owed to we the people while they play their vile
games (bold is my emphasis):
U.S.
Forgives Iraq Debt To Clear Way for IMF Reforms
April 27, 2007
"Consistent with a plan arranged last month at a meeting of top
industrialized nations, whereby the countries would eventually relieve
approximately 80 percent of the debt Iraq is said to owe them collectively,
Friday's move was the first among many planned to eventually forgive the
bulk of Iraq's crippling debt burden. In exchange, Iraq will
surrender its economic sovereignty to global financial institutions,
provide foreign investors greater access to Iraqi natural resources, and
increase investment opportunities for multinational corporations.
"According to the three-stage agreement reached last month at a meeting of
the Paris Club -- an organization seating representatives of nineteen
economic powers, including the United States, Japan, Russia and many
European countries -- 30 percent of Iraq's estimated $40 billion (USD) debt
to those nations is to be relieved outright, with no strings
attached."
Come
April 15, 2009, as you struggle to write that check to the IRS on top of
what was stolen from you throughout the year in the scheme called
withholding, remember where that money is going. Remember that a portion of
what you work for today will be sent without any legal authority under the
U.S. Constitution to fund these world banking conglomerates while you
struggle to turn on the heat this winter and buy warm clothes for your
family.
BASEL II
What is
it? Basel II is a continuation of the first agreement reached between
several countries:
The full
title of the accord is Basel II: The International Convergence of Capital
Measurement and Capital Standards - A Revised Framework.
"Higher
risks assets are moved to unregulated parts of holding companies.
Alternatively, the risk can be transferred directly to investors by
securitization, the process of taking a non-liquid asset or groups of assets
and transforming them into a security that can be traded on open markets.
"Basel
II has resulted in the evolution of a number of strategies to allow banks to
make risky investments, such as the subprime mortgage market. Higher risks
assets are moved to unregulated parts of holding companies. Alternatively,
the risk can be transferred directly to investors by securitization, the
process of taking a non-liquid asset or groups of assets and transforming
them into a security that can be traded on open markets."
Who are these people?
"The
Committee's members come from Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United
Kingdom and the United States. Countries are represented by their central
bank and also by the authority with formal responsibility for the prudential
supervision of banking business where this is not the central bank...
"The
Committee encourages contacts and cooperation among its members and other
banking supervisory authorities. It circulates to supervisors throughout the
world both published and unpublished papers providing guidance on banking
supervisory matters. Contacts have been further strengthened by an
International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) which takes place
every two years. The Committee's Secretariat is located at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland."
Right
now the IMF is
putting pressure on Congress to approve this massive fraud and theft. A
foreign entity demanding our Congress jump when they snap their fingers. The
foundation for a world currency controlled by these operations, IMF, BIS,
etc., has been underway for a long time and the blatant push for completion
is now out in the open.
And, now
for the kicker which I covered in a recent column.
Please watch this eight
minute video in which you will find out one of the hidden reasons for
this massive push to get these bills pushed through: hundreds of billions of
dollars will go to bail out foreign investors like communist China. This
short video contains a brief segment from CNBC (1:46 seconds into clip) and
you can bet key "leadership" in Congress, Obama and McCain all know the
bottom line. Remember the headlines last week?
China stops its banks from lending
to U.S. banks. Either Congress pony's up or no more credit. How does it
feel to be pushed around by the Reds?
The vote
passed in the counterfeit U.S. Senate last night. (Roll
call of votes here.) Not for the fake figure of $700 billion, but $850
billion dollars
with loads of pork --- including funding for mental health issues! The
final senate bill is over 400 pages; few senators had time to read it, but
voted for it. Feinstein's office received 95,000 calls; 85,000 against the
bail out, but she voted for it anyway. Why wouldn't she? Her and her
husband, Richard Blum, are tight in the sheets with commie China.
After
the vote, Sen. Harry Reid had the gall to hold a press conference to say "it
wasn't a perfect bill." Once again, these incompetent public servants are
handing we the people another dirty diaper to "hurry up and get it done" so
the little guy on the street can borrow more money! He also said it wasn't a
Democrat or Republican bill, but an American one. Cover their collective
backsides by sharing the blame when this one blows up in their faces.
The
House is expected to vote on their latest version of rape and pillage,
Friday, October 3, 2008. Get on the phone and tell your House member NO.
Every call counts until the vote
in the
House takes place. We have to stop the house because
the flood gates are about to burst: "One of the individuals in the
caucus today talked about a major insurance company -- a major insurance
company -- one with a name that everyone knows that's on the verge of going
bankrupt. That's what this is all about." Sen. Harry Reid, October 1, 2008;
he then back tracked realizing what the big gap on the front of his face let
loose.
And,
don't forget to send a tube of cheap lipstick to your house member and
counterfeit U.S. Senator who voted yes on this grand larceny. Send a deep
red like hookers wear as they ply their wares on the street corner and send
it to their district offices since Congress should adjourn for the year as
soon as the house sells us out Friday (barring a miracle). Let them return
to their district offices to tens of thousands of tubes of red lipstick. Get
as many people as you can, call the media and make the delivery of the tubes
of hooker lipstick a real event!
Footnotes:
1. IMF rip off
Links:
1 -
Updated Compilation of this massive fraud
against we the people
© 2008 -
NewsWithViews.com
You can Comment at
Hearlink Blog
Section 8 - "Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are
non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed
by any court of law or any administrative agency."
September 20, 2008
Now We See It: The White House Bailout Proposal - by Adam Davidson
Filed under:
Understanding The Crisis
It's the
shortest bill I have ever seen.
We will, no doubt, spend the rest of the week analyzing it and watching it
transform as it moves through Congress.
Here are some tentative, initial thoughts
Section 2:
(a) Authority to Purchase.--The Secretary is authorized to purchase, and to
make and fund commitments to purchase, on such terms and conditions as
determined by the Secretary, mortgage-related assets from any financial
institution having its headquarters in the United States.
(b) Necessary Actions.--The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as
the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act,
including, without limitation:
(1) appointing such employees as may be required to carry out the
authorities in this Act and defining their duties;
(2) entering into contracts, including contracts for services authorized by
section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, without regard to any other
provision of law regarding public contracts;
(3) designating financial institutions as financial agents of the
Government, and they shall perform all such reasonable duties related to
this Act as financial agents of the Government as may be required of them;
(4) establishing vehicles that are authorized, subject to supervision by the
Secretary, to purchase mortgage-related assets and issue obligations; and
(5) issuing such regulations and other guidance as may be necessary or
appropriate to define terms or carry out the authorities of this Act.
I would guess that this has to be one of the biggest peacetime transfers of
power from Congress to the Administration in history. (Anyone know?). Certainly
one of the most concise.
The Treasury Secretary can buy broadly defined assets, on any terms he wants,
he can hire anyone he wants to do it and can appoint private sector companies as
financial deputies of the US government. And he can write whatever regulation he
thinks are needed.
I understand that they wanted freedom to respond and an ability to move
quickly, but to designate the Treasury Secretary full power to oversee the, uh,
Treasury Secretary's decisions seems unusual. Especially given that Congress
only gets a report twice a year:
Within three months of the first exercise of the authority granted in
section 2(a), and semiannually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the
Committees on the Budget, Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the
House of Representatives and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the
authorities exercised under this Act and the considerations required by
section 3.
This graph really stands out:
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are
non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed
by any court of law or any administrative agency.
Whoa.
So, for the next three months, and then an additional six months after that,
the Treasury Secretary can do anything he deems appropriate without anybody
anywhere looking it over.
That seems like an awful lot of absolute power. Am I wrong? Is this typical
bureaucratic language? Or is this as strange as it seems?
The key two paragraphs are, of course:
The Secretary's authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act
shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time
and
Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended
by striking out the dollar limitation contained in such subsection and
inserting in lieu thereof $11,315,000,000,000.
Adam Davidson
You can Comment at
Hearlink Blog
Protecting the public interest in
any economic "bailout"
Dear Friend,
The U.S. government has been turned into an engine that accelerates the
wealth upwards into the hands of a few. The Wall Street bailout, the Iraq War,
military spending, tax cuts to the rich, and a for-profit health care system are
all about the acceleration of wealth upwards. And now, the American people are
about to pay the price of the collapse of the $513 trillion Ponzi scheme of
derivatives. Yes, that’s half a quadrillion dollars. Our first trillion dollar
compression bandage will hardly stem the hemorrhaging of an unsustainable Ponzi
scheme built on debt "de-leverages."
Does anyone seriously think that our public and private debts of some $45
trillion will be paid? That the administration's growth of the federal debt from
$5.6 trillion to $9.8 trillion while borrowing another trillion dollars from
Social Security has nothing to do with this? Does anyone not see that when we
spend nearly $16,000 for every family of four in our society for the military
each year that we are heading over the cliff?
This is a debt crisis, not a credit crisis. Just as FDR had to save
capitalism after Wall Street excesses, we have to re-invigorate our economy with
real - not imaginary - growth. It does not address the never-ending war on the
middle class.
The same corporate interests that profited from the closing of U.S.
factories, the movement of millions of jobs out of America, the off-shoring of
profits, the out-sourcing of workers, the crushing of pension funds, the
knocking down of wages, the cancellation of health care benefits, the sub-prime
lending are now rushing to Washington to get money to protect themselves.
The double standard is stunning: their profits are their profits, but their
losses are our losses.
This bailout will not bring real jobs back to America. It will not bring back
jobs that make things. It does not rebuild our schools, streets, neighborhoods,
parks or bridges. The major product of this financial economy is now debt.
Industrial capitalism has been destroyed.
In the next few days I will push for a plan that includes equity for every
American in any taxpayer investment in this so-called bail-out plan. Since the
bailout will cost each and every American about $2,300, I have proposed the
creation of a United States Mutual Trust Fund, which will take control of $700
billion in stock assets, convert those assets to shares, and distribute $2,300
worth of shares to new individual savings accounts in the name of each and every
American.
I will also insist that all of the following issues be considered in whatever
Congress passes:
- Reinstatement of the provisions of Glass-Steagall, which forbade
speculation
- Re-regulation of the finance, insurance, and real estate industries
- Accountability on the part of those who took the companies down:
a) resignations of management
b) givebacks of executive compensation packages
c) limitations on executive compensation
d) admission by CEO's of what went wrong and how, prior to any government
bailout
- Demands for transparencey
a) with respect to analyzing the transactions which took the companies
down
b) with respect to Treasury's dealings with the companies pre and
post-bailout
- An equity position for the taxpayers
a) some form of ownership of assets
- Some credible formula for evaluating the price of the assets that the
government is buying.
- A sunset clause on the legislation
- Full public disclosure by members of Congress of assets held, with
possible conflicts put in blind trust.
- A ban on political campaign contributions from officers of corporations
receiving bailouts
- A requirement that 2008 cycle candidates return political contributions
to officers and representatives of corporations receiving bailouts
And, most importantly, some mechanism for direct assistance to homeowners
saddled with unreasonable or unmanageable mortgages, as well as protection for
renters who have lived up to their obligation but fall victim to financial
tragedy when the property they live in undergoes foreclosure.
These are just some thoughts on the run. You will hear more from me tomorrow.
Dennis J Kucinich
www.Kucinich.us
216-252-9000 877-933-6647
You can Comment at
Hearlink Blog
September 23, 2008
Primary Bailout Guideline Should Be
Bottom-up For Tax Payers First
By Rob Kall
As the members of congress explore solutions--
and I hope they are really exploring, not just working from the the proposal
Paulson has submitted-- they should be keeping one thing foremost in their
minds-- "How will this help taxpayers and stabilize the economy-- not "How will
this help the failing financial entities?"
We're not just talking about the $700 billion
bailout. There's also the $50 billion loan to the auto companies and now the
auto loan companies have started to come begging too.
The fact is that We the people are in the
drivers seat, negotiatons-wise. The question is, who are the members of congress
taking care of? Nowadays, when you buy or sell a house, you have a realtor who
must identify his or her self as performing just one of those functions. Well,
we need to be really clear that our legislators are representing the taxpayers,
not the massive corporations.
When it comes to the $700 billion bailout,
which many are beginning to predict could be more like three or four trillion
dollars, the negotiations should be aiming to keep the loans flowing and the
dollar up, not getting the most money to the corporations that gambled away
their right to profits or stability.
We're seeing scavengers like Barclays and
Nomura buying up parts of Lehman bros. We need to make sure that as this
bailout unfolds, the Fed is not left with the most devalued, worthless parts.
Naomi Klein was half joking the other day, on the Bill Maher show, when she said
that instead of socializing the losing parts, we should nationalize Exxon. Well,
maybe not Exxon, but at least, let's grab and governmentalize the strongest,
most valuable parts of these companies that are drowning in their own debt.
Allowing Barclays and Nomura to cherry pick is another way of giving corporate
gift handout.
Let's look at the bailout as a way to help
taxpayers from the bottom up. That means that those hundreds of billions of
dollars must flow through taxpayers hands to reach the banks. Use coupons that
taxpayers can use to help themselves with their problem mortgages-- or to help
them consolidate their debts. Why punish the people who were more cautious and
responsible, saddling them with the debts the whole nation will be carrying.
Put out coupons for borrowers who meet the
credit criteria and let the borrowers decide where the money goes. This is what
Jeff Howe describes in his book, Crowdsourcing, or what
James Surowiecki described in Wisdom of the Crowds. What, you want to go
with the experts-- the ones who got us or allowed us to descend into this mess?
Trust the tens of millions of Americans to invest their money in a smarter way
than any group of capitalists. We have faced the time where the wisdom of the
market-- trusting capitalism-- has passed. Now we need to trust our own people.
When it comes to the Auto Manufacturers and
now, the auto financiers, we need to get tough with them and do the same thing--
help them through the bottom up-- coupons or programs that American consumers
participate in-- and require that those programs only apply to vehicles that
provide at least 35 MPG fuel efficiencly. They're coming to us begging. Don't
give them a handout without getting anything back.
The big corporations that have been ruining
America, corrupting the political process, despoiling the environment,
globalizing our economy at the price of American Industry, is coming to congress
now on bended knees. Bush and Paulson are trying to pull another rush job like
they did with WMDs, using them to sell the Iraq war. The members of congress, at
least some of them, are smarter this time around. And we have better tools for
raising our voices and letting them know, NO FUCKING WAY!
The democrats who have been rubber stamping
just about everything George Bush has thrown at them have an opportunity now to
play hardball. They should be not only looking at ways to approach this from the
bottom up, really taking care of the American people, but they should be
agressively figuring out how to use this moment of crisis and opportunity to
make something magical happen-- and give the American people something they
really deserve-- universal single payer health care. There's an economic reason
for it too. The current system, with insurance companies-- and it looks like
even the non-profit "Blues" are converting to for-profit- are in the process of
parasitizing and bankrupting the country from another direction.
If the congress is smart it will come back to
Paulson, Bernanke and Bush and DEMAND that they put the Auto Maker Loan and
Universal healthcare into this package, and put all of it into a bottom-up model
that gives the taxpayers a real share of the benefits as well as the risk this
disaster capitalist assault on America has inflicted.
Chris Dodd, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Dem senators need to
really show that they are covering the taxpayers backs. Bernie Sanders has taken
a solid stand, saying that any business so big that it can't fail is too big to
exist. That's the way all the senators need to be thinking-- the smaller the
better. It's one thing to make sure CEOs don't take golden parachute payouts or
outrageous salaries for doing bad work, but that's small change. The big picture
must include the senate and house totally revising the Paulson plan so money for
corporations flows through the taxpayer. It's the best, smartest, fairest way to
keep the taxpayer in the loop.
You can Comment at
Hearlink Blog
FLASHBACK TO 1999: FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC: HOW IT ALL BEGAN:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
September 20, 2008.
New York Times
WASHINGTON — It was a room full of people who rarely hold their tongues. But
as the Fed chairman,
Ben S. Bernanke, laid out the potentially devastating ramifications of
the financial crisis before congressional leaders on Thursday night, there
was a stunned silence at first.
Mr. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary
Henry M. Paulson Jr. had made an urgent and unusual evening visit to
Capitol Hill, and they were gathered around a conference table in the
offices of House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi.
“When you listened to him describe it you gulped," said Senator
Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York.
As Senator
Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and chairman of the
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, put it Friday morning on the
ABC program “Good Morning America,” the congressional leaders were told
“that we’re literally maybe days away from a complete meltdown of our
financial system, with all the implications here at home and globally.”
Mr. Schumer added, “History was sort of hanging over it, like this was a
moment.”
When Mr. Schumer described the meeting as “somber,” Mr. Dodd cut in.
“Somber doesn’t begin to justify the words,” he said. “We have never heard
language like this.”
“What you heard last evening,” he added, “is one of those rare moments,
certainly rare in my experience here, is Democrats and Republicans deciding
we need to work together quickly.”
Although Mr. Schumer, Mr. Dodd and other participants declined to repeat
precisely what they were told by Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson, they said the
two men described the financial system as effectively bound in a knot that
was being pulled tighter and tighter by the day.
“You have the credit lines in America, which are the lifeblood of the
economy, frozen.” Mr. Schumer said. “That hasn’t happened before. It’s a
brave new world. You are in uncharted territory, but the one thing you do
know is you can’t leave them frozen or the economy will just head south at a
rapid rate.”
As he spoke, Mr. Schumer swooped his hand, to make the gesture of a
plummeting bird. “You know we’d be lucky ...” he said as his voice trailed
off. “Well, I’ll leave it at that.”
As officials at the Treasury Department raced on Friday to draft
legislative language for an ambitious plan for the government to buy
billions of dollars of illiquid debt from ailing American financial
institutions, legislators on Capitol Hill said they planned to work through
the weekend reviewing the proposal and making efforts to bring a package of
measures to the floor of the House and Senate by the end of next week.
Lawmakers in both parties described the meeting in Ms. Pelosi’s office on
Thursday night with Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bernanke as collaborative, and that
they were prepared to put politics aside to address the needs of the
American people.
While Democrats initially said after the meeting that they planned to use
the administration’s proposal of a huge rescue effort to win support for an
economic
stimulus package, they pulled back slightly on Friday morning, saying
that their top priority was to help put together the bailout package and
stabilize the economy.
But it was clear they continued to examine ways to make clear that the
government was stepping up not just to help the major financial firms but
also to protect the interests of American taxpayers and families by
safeguarding their pensions and college savings, and by preventing any
further drying up of consumer credit.
In addition to potential stimulus measures, which could include an
extension of unemployment benefits and spending on public infrastructure
projects, Democrats said they intended to consider measures to help stem
home foreclosures and stabilize real estate values.
Among the potential steps Congress can take include approving legislation
to allow bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of primary mortgages —
authority that the bankruptcy laws do not currently allow and that the
banking industry has strenuously opposed.
But the Democrats said it was too soon to discuss such details, and that
they were awaiting a draft of the proposal from the Treasury Department.
“We have got to deal with the foreclosure issue,” Mr. Dodd said. “You
have got to stop that hemorrhaging..If you don’t, the problem doesn’t go
away. Ben Bernanke has said it over and over again. Hank Paulson recognizes
it. This problem began with bad lending practices. Those are his words, not
mine, and so this plan must address that or I’ll be back here in front of a
bank of microphones at some point explaining the next failure.”
Even before the drafting of the plan was complete, the Bush
administration and the Fed began efforts to sell the idea of a huge rescue
to potentially skeptical rank-and-file members of Congress. Mr. Paulson and
Mr. Bernanke held a conference call with House Republicans to explain their
thinking.
Senator
Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the senior Republican on the Senate
banking committee, said in a television interview that cost to the
government of purchasing bad debt could run to $1 trillion — a potential
warning sign since Mr. Shelby is a longtime skeptic of government
intervention in the private market.
Until Mr. Shelby was interviewed on Friday morning, officials on Capitol
Hill had been careful not to discuss specific figures, though the rescue
envisioned by the Treasury Department clearly entails a government
appropriation of hundreds of billions of dollars.
You can Comment at
Hearlink Blog
NOTE: This e-mail was first released in March 2008 and, as one
can see
from the first accurate prediction, a person could almost assume that
the claims made after that might also come true.
REFLECTION: To almost a 100% certainty, history will show that the BASIC
FABRIC that made America GREAT, prosperous, so innovative and the #1
country that MOST people would love to relocate to, began to UNravel
under the neo-fascist, police-state-like, war criminal killer pigs of
the BUSH neo-cons who ALMOST brought this country to another Depression
Era armageddon during the week of September 14, 2008.
REMINDER: Senator John McCain voted WITH Bush 91% of the time in the
last seven (7) years, so voting for McCain is voting for a continuation
of the 4th Reich established under Bush beginning w/ his beloved "USA
Patriot Act" which is VERY similar to Hitler's "Enabling Act" which he
instituted in the aftermath of his own "9/11" event: the phony Reichstag
fire ignited by "terrorists!"
Read the following and weep ... and I'll see you all in a concentration
camp....
DATELINE: March 2008
SPECIAL "CLOSED SESSION" OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
DISCUSSED
A LOT MORE THAN THE PENDING SECURITY SURVEILLANCE PROVISIONS! LAST
NIGHT's SESSION WAS ONLY THE 4th TIME IN 176 YEARS THAT CONGRESS CLOSED
ITS DOORS TO THE PUBLIC! HERE ARE THE ALLEGED LEAKS FROM LAST NIGHT's
CLOSED-DOOR SESSION OF CONGRESS ... ABSOLUTELY FRIGHTENING! -
Word has begun leaking from last nights special, closed-door session of
the United States House of Representatives. Not only did members
discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason
for the closed door session, they were also bluntly warned about:
° the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September
2008;
° the imminent collapse of U.S. federal government finances by
February 2009;
° the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the
collapse
° advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move
against the government;
° the detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed
throughout the USA;
° the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the
collapses;
° the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their
families to reside during expected massive civil unrest;
° the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with
Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor
pool) to complete the North American Trade Union;
° the issuance of a new currency -- THE AMERO -- for all three (3)
nations as the proposed solution to the coming ECONOMIC ARMAGEDDON.
Members of Congress were FORBIDDEN to reveal what was discussed and ABC
News via WCPO Web site at the link below CONFIRMS congress members were
FORBIDDEN to talk about it!
Several are so furious and concerned about the future of the country,
they have begun leaking info. More details coming later today and over
the weekend.
You can Comment at
Hearlink Blog
Please go to
Ascension
for SOLUTIONS
Who Wins from this Bailout? - The primary owner of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, (the Fed bank with the most clout), J.P. Morgan Chase. J.P. Morgan who just purchased Bear Stearns and the good assets of Washington Mutual for less than .50 on the dollar & and.....and another owner of the Federal Reserve Bank, Bank of America who just purchased Merrill Lynch.
Before we do "Bailout" WE SHOULD NATIONALIZE THE FED which is currently privately owned - no brainer! Listen to Bail Out - The Fed Wins, The People Lose
The fact is lots of people got very very rich dealing in, and selling extremely high risk, highly leveraged debt, cleverly marketed as financial ‘new products’. Those at the SEC and the leaders of such markets were well aware that they were selling very risky paper which had no assets of real value to back them up. (thus the reason Bears, Morgan, Merrill, Sachs all had debt to equity ration ‘exceptions’ granted by the SEC). Those same leaders are today living in million dollar homes, with millions in the bank…….that my friends is where the money went.
Will Wall Street be investigated and prosecuted?
Will they be audited and taxed?
Will they be made subject to the same market forces as Main Street?
READ Most U.S. Corps. Don't Pay Income Tax & Ralph Nader for president
You can Comment at Hearlink Blog
Who voted for the BAILOUT
October 3, 2008
BAILOUT PASSES HOUSE, 263-171 - WHAT HAPPENS NOW?
October 1, 2008 Senate passed Bailout, 74 - 25
“Driven by fear we are moving quickly to pass a bill" - This is the same tactic that was used right after the 9/11 crisis - so that we, the people, lost our civil rights - We should know by now that when something is "FEAR DRIVEN" it is bound to fail.
Kucinich: We Had Alternatives
WASHINGTON, D.C. (October 3, 2008) – Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) issued the following statement after voting against the Wall Street bail out plan, H.R. 1424, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008:
“The public is being led to believe that Congress has reconsidered its position because we have before us a better bill than we had a few days ago. It is the same bill plus hundreds of new pages for hundreds of millions of tax breaks. What does this have to do with the troubles of Wall Street?
“Driven by fear we are moving quickly to pass a bill, which may produce a temporary uptick for the market, but nothing for millions of homeowners whose misfortunes are at the center of our economic woes. People do not have money to pay their mortgages. After this passes, they will still not have money to pay their mortgages. People will still lose their homes while Wall Street is bailed out.
“The central flaw of this bill is that there are NO stronger protections for homeowners and NO changes in the language to ensure that the secretary has the authority to compel mortgage servicers to modify the terms of mortgages. And there are NO stronger regulatory changes to fix the circumstances that allowed this to happen.
“We should have created a mechanism for our government to take a controlling interest in mortgage-backed securities and use our power to work out a new deal for the homeowners. We could have done this. We should have done this. But we didn't.
“Now millions of Americans will face the threat of foreclosure without any help. And the numbers will soon rise for a number of reasons. Not only because of the Alt-A, jumbo mortgages which will soon be reset at higher interest rates, but because the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is pushing up rates on adjustable mortgages and more than half of the US adjustable mortgage rates are tied to LIBOR. Homeowner defaults will grow in significant numbers. Let’s see if Congress will be as quick to help homeowners on Main Street as they were to help speculators on Wall Street.
“Now the government will have to borrow $700 billion from banks, with interest, to give banks a $700 billion bailout, and in return the taxpayers get $700 billion in toxic debt. The Senate "improved" the bailout by giving tax breaks to people in foreclosure. People in foreclosure need help paying their mortgage, they do not seek tax breaks.
“Across our Nation, foreclosures continue to devastate our communities, people are losing their jobs, and the prices of necessities are skyrocketing. This legislation, just like the one we defeated last week, will do nothing to solve the problems plaguing American families or help them to get out from underneath the oppressive debt they have been forced to take on.
“Unfortunately, there has been no discussion of the underlying debt-based economy and the role of our monetary system in facilitating the redistribution of wealth upwards.
“It is not as though we had no choice but to pass the bill before us. We could have done this differently. We could have demanded language in the legislation that would have empowered the Treasury to compel mortgage servicers to rework the terms of mortgage loans so homeowners could avoid foreclosure. We could have put regulatory structures in place to protect investors. We could have stopped the speculators.
“This bill represents an utter failure of the Democratic process. It represents the triumph of special interest over the triumph of the public interest. It represents the inability of government to defend the public interest in the face of great pressure from financial interests. We could have recognized the power of government to prime the pump of the economy to get money flowing through out society by creating jobs, health care, and major investments in green energy. What a lost opportunity! What a moment of transition away from democracy and towards domination of America by global economic interests.
“Years ago, in a Cleveland neighborhood, I saw a hand-scrawled sign above a cash register in a delicatessen. The sign said: "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash." The sign above the Speaker's rostrum reads "In God We Trust," but we are paying the cash to Wall Street.
“It is not as if we had no other choice but to pass this bill.” You can Comment at Hearlink Blog
October 3, 2008
Ten Reasons Not To Bail Out Wall Street by Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts, Esq.
(1) Crime that pays is crime that stays.
There is reason to believe that Wall Street and those they represent are holding loans without collateral, multiple loans secured by the same properties, and other fraudulent instruments among the “troubled assets.” Based on the secret “Treasury Conference Call” with 800 Wall Street insiders, we know the deal proposed to be passed by Congress isn’t the real deal promised to Wall Street.
(2) This smells like obstruction of justice.
Bail-out without due diligence of so called “troubled assets” is a perfect way to hide documentation of financial crimes. It is also a perfect means to launder both the past ill-gotten gains and new federal money spent recklessly and without necessary safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Be very suspicious when they tell you “we just can’t tell what’s in these troubled assets.” We can assure you that the federal government has field offices all across the country that deal with significant amounts of real estate and mortgage assets on a daily basis. If Treasury refuses for more than a decade to comply with the laws, with approximately $4 trillion missing (and counting), it is not competent to manage $700 billion of taxpayer money while its arm is twisted by Wall Street.
(3) Wall Street owes the federal government money.
We need to get stolen money back from the banks that served as depositories for the US government (including trillions for which the Pentagon and HUD could not account) and punish them, not create another opportunity for them to game the system and engage in criminal enterprises to rob consumers. To the extent there has been regulatory wrong-doing, let’s not let the miscreants leave town with the evidence.
(4) Good guys are shut out.
A bail-out provides no way for honest leaders to come to the fore and use their creativity and expertise to restore balance and integrity to the system or for unproductive and poorly-managed banks that contribute to current over-capacity in the banking system to die a dignified death.
(5) This results in more investment in the “bubble economy.”
Spending massive amounts on non-productive uses (“buying” worthless credit default swaps, mortgages with no collateral and derivatives, which could even include the derivatives used to manipulate the precious metals markets) as opposed to productive uses (repairing infrastructure, creating alternative energy systems, supporting inventing and production of “green” products) is inflationary.
This bail-out will drive prices of food, water and energy up for the people who can least afford it.
(6) Bail-out does not result in capital circulating in healthy ways.
The bail-out of Wall Street and too-big-to-fail banks and insurance companies that are getting bigger by the minute by swallowing up other failing financial institutions (and creating more institutions that are “too big to fail”) does not result in trickle-down to those whose money was stolen in recent swindles (S&L, dot.com, current housing crisis), i.e., the taxpayers/middle class and working poor.
(7) These arrangements will result in more corruption.
Centralized “fixes” are sure to result in black holes, no-bid contracts and other scandals.
(8) The bail-out drains the real economy, rather than invests in the real economy.
The US economy can’t be productive or grow if consumers don’t have jobs and can’t afford to purchase goods and services. Real stimulation of Main Street is accomplished through productive investment, not bail-outs that shift money to unproductive sectors. We should use all of our precious resources to reinvest in our people in the real economy.
(9) It props up sectors that need to downsize and consolidate.
There is significant overcapacity in the financial and banking sectors. Brainpower and talent needs to stop blowing financial bubbles and shift to economic activities that create real value.
(10) It is a temporary “fix” to keep Wall Street afloat until after the election.
Our resources are better invested in permanent, long-term solutions. This bail-out will not fix anything. Rather, it will help the perpetrators get away and ensure that the ultimate day of reckoning is worse.
The Administration wants to drain the real economy to bail out Wall Street. It seems to us that the more appropriate plan would be to require Wall Street to return the $4 trillion plus that is missing and use that to rebuild the real economy.
We think the time has come to reverse the flow. Go to any business school in the country. That is what they teach. Money should move out of unproductive sectors into productive sectors. The bail-out does just the opposite.
“Just say NO!” Ten Reasons Not To Bail Out Wall Street You can Comment at Hearlink Blog